How we eat appears to influence how much we eat

How we eat appears to influence how much we eat

Some individuals, hard as they try, may still fine it difficult to moderate the quantity of food they eat. At least one reason for this can be that they are eating foods that aren

Print This Post Print This Post

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Comments

RSS Comments - TrackBack

  1. Haarajot says:

    This might be one of possible factors of eating more when stressed. I notice I eat more quickly and take larger bites in those circumstances.

    June 19, 2009 @ 3:10 pm

  2. Chris P says:

    Hi John, I would like to politely offer some thoughts for consideration.
    Paul McKennas book crossed my desk in the course of my interest and I read it without listening to the CD. The book is not so much about what to eat but about HOW to eat. In discussion with a friend a one liner was recounted to me. -”Have things really become so bad that people have to reminded how to eat?” Yep, that is the actuality.
    Although unspoken, Paul capitalises upon some important matters.
    There is a paradox that for some who attempt weight loss, either by calorie or food group restriction, there is a tendency to obsess about food and succumb to cravings. Another paradox is the belief that going longer between meals will help weight loss. Going longer between meals may result in a larger or rushed meal and this may be counter productive.
    My six penn’th is to suggest for discussion that hyperinsullinemia may be factorial in this.
    Both these paradoxes, if they are indeed valid submissions, have the the potential to be disruptive to the body. In the first instance, an individual may crave foods typically of high GI/GL, and in the second, the GL of the meal is greater by virtue of increased portion size. Both these effects raise the loading upon the body of blood glucose. Greater postprandrial loading; is that the expression? The concept of fast food or convenience food can be examined at a number of levels.
    Things have got so bad that some folks have to be (constantly) reminded how to eat and what to eat. Speaking more generally, we need for those with influence and/or responsibility to get to grips with the why.

    June 19, 2009 @ 3:52 pm

  3. Dave says:

    I’d ask the same question of this strategy as many other dietary interventions: what other animal needs to regulate how fast it eats? Does a lion count its bites of water buffalo?

    It takes time to generate the chemical signals of satiety, but the body has evolved to deal with this by making sure that you don’t get hungry until you’ve used up all the food you ate. Unless, that is, the energy regulation system isn’t working properly, either due to disease or because what we ate falls outside of the evolutionary norm. So I have no doubt that slowing intake of refined carbohydrates does a lot to improve satiety by reducing the associated insulin spike and thus making energy more available between meals. But, to me at least, it seems more sensible to just skip the spaghetti rather than count the number of times you chew it.

    June 19, 2009 @ 7:52 pm

  4. Umstellung der Essgeschwindigkeit? « KOPIS.DE says:

    [...] schwarzen Tag der Demokratie will ich auch noch etwas interessantes posten. Im Artikel “How we eat appears to influence how much we eat” schreibt Dr Briffa, dass die Essgeschwindigkeit massgeblich zum S

    June 19, 2009 @ 8:20 pm

  5. Marilyn Finlay says:

    Despite John Briffa’s constant exhortations to cut carbohydrate and up protein intake if we want to lose weight, I find that if I do this I a) lose weight extremely slowly and (b) feel very tired. Maybe for some people some carbohydrate (say wholemeal bread) is necessary even when trying to lose weight. I also feel hungry if I eat protein without carbohydrate.

    June 19, 2009 @ 10:55 pm

  6. jenna says:

    I would have to agree with you Marilyn.
    Though I follow Dr Briffa’s blog due to my prolonged and increasing exasperation regarding my appetite/nutritional problems; I have had bulimia since 16 yrs of age. (I have seen psychologists, but am finding that my problems rather than psychological are most definitely related to what i eat) I can notice a huge difference depending on what I eat, but am finding that socially this is limiting, in that I am aware of how the food that I eat effects me deeply, but the people that I am with eat to simply enjoy and their health problems do not seem so apparent to them. Marilyn, I do suggest that you read Dr Briffa’s book, as his types, suggest differences in meal content, this regarding meat, fat, carbs etc. Personally, I have found this extremely helpful, and especially because it seems to echo what I feel instinctively about my relationship with food.

    June 20, 2009 @ 3:50 am

  7. Loz says:

    Dave has provided a useful common sense measure for us with the image of animals’ failure to count the number of times they chew. Meat-eating men seem to love references to Big Cats.
    He’s right: they do things naturally out there in the natural world…He’s right we should not obsess. We may however have to re-educate ourselves to rediscover what our bodies can tell us, to rediscover what the Big Cats never lost: receptivity to our own bodily signals, the freedom to explore what suits us best. Why is this necessary for the likes of myself, Marilyn and Jenna?
    …Big Cats do not eat in canteens. In fact they do not go to school, nor know the factory life that helped to determine state education’s traditions – both environments apt to teach us to deny our physical instincts. Nor do they have anything so mind-bendingly sick as the Holocaust or the Potato Famine somewhere deep in their family/community history. They were raised by a pride of unsophisticates with no access to the media nor all the pressures of human social existence, so they have no concept of the “eat to live? or live to eat?” challenge that the Italian & French traditionalist slowfooders pose to the Anglo-Saxon world. Live for all the pleasures that life affords, but particularly the basic one of knowing and responding to one’s own, very individual, physical reality…So remember to chat with your companions for 20 mins over a minimally processed appetizer before helping yourself to slightly less than you think you want of your main course, because there is always time to take more when you want it. I read once that it takes 20 mins for satiety to register. So let us take our time, and enjoy the human(e) company we can share our lives and our bread with.

    June 24, 2009 @ 1:53 am

  8. Trinkwasser says:

    “t takes time to generate the chemical signals of satiety, but the body has evolved to deal with this by making sure that you don

    July 12, 2009 @ 8:09 pm

  9. Umstellung der Essgeschwindigkeit? « KOPIS.DE says:

    [...] schwarzen Tag der Demokratie will ich auch noch etwas interessantes posten. Im Artikel “How we eat appears to influence how much we eat” schreibt Dr Briffa, dass die Essgeschwindigkeit massgeblich zum Sättigungsgefühl und [...]

    March 10, 2010 @ 2:21 pm

Write Comment









Store
Audio BooksBooksE-books
recent posts
Dr Briffa Facebook
Dr Briffa Twitter
Dr Briffa