If you’re reading this blog post on 5th March 2012, there’s a good chance you came to it as a result of listening to discussion on BBC Radio 4’s programme ‘You and Yours’ about the most appropriate diet for those suffering from diabetes. You can listen to the broadcast here (the item starts about 15 minutes into the show). The UK’s largest diabetes charity – Diabetes UK – advises diabetics to include starchy foods with every meal. I strongly object to this on the grounds that this approach is unscientific, counter-intuitive, and likely to worse blod sugar control and increase the risk of complications. I wrote this article ahead of time, because I know how challenging it can be to get all the most important facts out when time is short. This article is an attempt to get down what I believe to be the salient points, with some references to the science where relevant.
What is diabetes?
Diabetes is a condition characterised by raised levels of sugar (glucose) in the bloodstream. It comes in two main forms:
1. Type 1 diabetes: caused by a failure of the body (actually, the pancreas) to secrete insulin – the chief hormone in the body responsible for keeping blood sugar levels in check. It usually develops in childhood or early adulthood. The condition requires treatment with insulin.
2. Type 2 diabetes: here there is often a lot of insulin in the body, but the problem is the body has become somewhat unresponsive to the effects of this hormone (insulin resistance). Sometimes, type 2 diabetics can have difficulty secreting enough insulin as a result of what is sometimes termed ‘pancreatic exhaustion’. The condition generally develops in adulthood (though it’s increasingly being diagnosed in children). Treatment usually involves lifestyle modification (diet and exercise) and drugs. Some type 2 diabetics go on to require insulin. Type 2 diabetes makes up more than 90 per cent of all cases of diabetes.
What’s the problem with raised levels of sugar in the bloodstream?
When blood sugar levels are raised, there’s increased risk of glucose attaching to and damaging tissues. This can lead to complications such as eye disease and blindness, heart disease, kidney disease and poor circulation and nerve damage in the legs which may lead to amputation.
What does Diabetes UK recommend that diabetic eat?
You can read Diabetes UK’s advice for type 2 diabetics here. Here’s a core piece of advice:
At each meal include starchy carbohydrate foods
Examples include bread, pasta, chapatis, potatoes, yam, noodles, rice and cereals. The amount of carbohydrate you eat is important to control your blood glucose levels. Especially try to include those that are more slowly absorbed (have a lower glycaemic index) as these won’t affect your blood glucose levels as much. Better choices include: pasta, basmati or easy cook rice, grainy breads such as granary, pumpernickel and rye, new potatoes, sweet potato and yam, porridge oats, All-Bran and natural muesli. The high fibre varieties of starchy foods will also help to maintain the health of your digestive system and prevent problems such as constipation.
What’s the problem with this advice?
Starch is made up of chains of sugar (glucose) molecules. When we eat starch we digest it down into sugar and then absorb this sugar into the bloodstream from the gut. While it’s often said that ‘complex carbohydrates’ give a ‘slow, steady’ release of sugar into the bloodstream, this is generally not the case at all. We know this from research in which the tendency for foods to disrupt blood sugar levels has been measured to derive what’s known as its ‘glycaemic index’.
The GI is a quantification of the speed and extent to which a food releases sugar into the bloodstream. The higher a food’s GI, the more disruptive it is to blood sugar levels. In the GI scale, pure glucose is given a value of 100, and then other foods are compared to it.
Table sugar (that some people use on their cereal, add to tea or coffee and use in baking) is made of sucrose, which is half glucose and half fructose. The GI of table sugar is about 65.
Just bear these things in mind when consider that boiled and mashed potato have GIs that averages about 55 and 70 respectively. Wholemeal bread has a GI that averages out at about 70. The GIs of white rice, egg noodles and porridge are about 60, 57 and 70 respectively. We can see from this that many of the foods Diabetes UK recommend for diabetics are about as disruptive for blood sugar as eating sugar itself.
You can read what Diabetes UK has to say about the GI here.
Here you will find that Diabetes UK gives us this table:
Diabetes UK does not define what constitutes ‘low-‘ ‘medium-‘ and ‘high-GI’. However, rather oddly, brown rice gets a ‘high’ rating, though its GI is about 45, while say Shredded Wheat is rated as ‘medium’ while its GI is 83.
Over in the ‘low-GI’ column we have Special K and Sultana Bran, yet both of these cereals have GIs of about 70 (Special K’s GI varies according to country but averages out at about 70). In fact, Diabetes UK gives special mention to these named foods in its breakfast recommendations.
However, including starchy (and sometimes sugary) foods such as these in the diet will likely worsen blood sugar control (compared to a diet lower or devoid of these foods), thereby increasing the need for medication and enhancing risk of complications.
What might explain this misinformation and bad advice?
See here for a list of corporate sponsors of Diabetes UK. In amongst a whole raft of food and diet companies, you’ll see ‘Kelloggs’ (who make Sultana Bran and Special K) and ‘Shredded Wheat’. Could this explain why there highly disruptive foods get special mention from Diabetes UK and make their way into the ‘low-GI’ category even though they are anything but? I don’t know, but we should at least ask the question, I think.
Does eating less carbohydrate help control diabetes?
The evidence regarding lower-carbohydrate eating in diabetes has been well reviewed [1].
This review provided evidence that carbohydrate restriction improves blood sugar control. One study, for instance, found that a low-carbohydrate diet over 6 months allowed more than 95 per cent of type 2 diabetes to reduce or eliminate their medication entirely [2].
It should also be pointed out that, overall, low-carbohydrate diets are significantly more effective than higher carbohydrate, lower-fat diets for weight loss (the evidence is comprehensively reviewed in my latest book Escape the Diet Trap).
Low-carbohydrate eating is not a magic pill, but in practice countless individuals have found it to be highly effective for controlling blood sugar levels and improving markers for disease. I’ve known many type 2 diabetic use this approach to return to a state where tests essentially show no evidence of diabetes.
So what’s wrong with low-carbohydrate diets?
The usual accusation that such diets are high in fat, including ‘saturated’ fat that can cause heart disease (that diabetics are prone to). Actually, there is good evidence that when carbohydrate is cut from the diet, while the percentage of fat increases in the diet, the absolute amount of fat in the diet stays about the same (in other words, those switching to low-carb eating don’t generally eat more fat as a result) [3-6].
This issue is a moot point, because there really is no evidence that saturated fat causes heart disease anyway. There have been several recent major reviews of the evidence regarding role that saturated fat, or fat in general, has in heart disease.
One such review conducted by researchers from McMaster University in Canada found that epidemiological evidence simply does not support a link between saturated fat and heart disease [7]. Another recent study out of Oakland Research Institute in California, USA [8] – this one, a meta-analysis (adding together of several similar studies) found saturated fat consumption has no links with heart disease risk.
Yet another comprehensive review of the relevant literature was performed as part of an ‘Expert Consultation’ held jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the US [9]. Again, no association was found between saturated fat and heart disease. This review also included a meta-analysis of intervention studies in which the effects of low-fat diets (these usually target saturated fat specifically) were assessed. Lower fat diets were not found to reduce the risk of either heart attack or risk of death due to heart disease.
The most recent review of the evidence was a 2011 meta-analysis, in which the results of 48 studies were pooled together [10]. Each of these studies tested the effect of reducing fat and/or modifying its nature in the diet. In general, the study subjects reduced saturated fat intake and/or replaced it at least partially with so-called ‘polyunsaturated’ fats (e.g. vegetable oils). The results of this review showed that these interventions did nothing to reduce the risk death due to cardiovascular disease nor overall risk of death. In studies in which lowering and/or modification of fat was the only intervention, risk of cardiovascular events such as heart disease and stroke was not reduced either.
What about fibre?
You’ll notice that part of Diabetes UK’s justification for including sugar-disruptive foods in the diet of diabetics is the fibre they can provide. The sort of fibre that is generally being referred to here is known as ‘insoluble’ fibre – more colloquially referred to as ‘bran’ or ‘roughage’. This is said to provide bulk to our stools, and help prevent constipation and colon cancer.
Actually, insoluble fibre can be irritant to the gut, and provoke symptoms such as bloating and discomfort. On the other hand, the other main form of fibre – ‘soluble’ fibre – tends to improve bowel symptoms such as constipation and abdominal discomfort [11]. Soluble fibre is found abundantly in natural foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds.
The idea that insoluble fibre helps prevent colon cancer is not supported by the research, either. For example, studies show supplementing the diet with fibre does not reduce the risk of cancerous tumours or pre-cancerous lesions [12-14].
The authors of a recent review concluded that “…there does not seem to be much use for fiber in colorectal diseases”, adding that their desire was to “emphasize that what we have all been made to believe about fiber needs a second look. We often choose to believe a lie, as a lie repeated often enough by enough people becomes accepted as the truth” [15].
Anything else?
On 2nd March I had an email from someone telling me that he’d recently been approached by people in the street asking for donations to Diabetes UK. Nothing odd about that, except that they, apparently, were using Krispy Kreme doughnuts as an inducement. His enquiries reveal that Diabetes UK sanctions this approach and discourages the elimination of any food group from the diet. What, even doughnuts? What sort of a message does using doughnuts to induce people to donate to Diabetes UK send out? Sadly, in my view, it’s a message that is consistent with the wrong-headed and potentially dangerous dietary advice that this charity dishes out generally.
References:
1. Accurso A, et al. Dietary carbohydrate restriction in type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2008 Apr 8;5:9
2. Westman EC, et al. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutrition & Metabolism 2008;5:36
3. Larosa JC, et al. Effects of high-protein, low-carbohydrate dieting on plasma lipoproteins and body weight. J Am Diet Assoc 1980;77(3):264-70
4. Yancy, WS Jr, et al. A low carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:69-77
5. Dansinger ML, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, WeightWatchers, and Zone Diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction. JAMA 2005; 293: 43–53
6. Gardner CD, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among over- weight premenopausal women. JAMA 2007; 297: 969–977
7. Mente A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Evidence Supporting a Causal Link Between Dietary Factors and Coronary Heart Disease. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(7):659-669
8. Siri-Tarino PW, et al. Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91(3):535-46
9. Skeaff CM, et al. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: summary of evidence from prospective and randomised controlled trials. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2009;55:173-201
10. Hooper L, et al. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;7:CD002137
11. Heizer WD, et al. The role of diet in symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in adults: a narrative review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(7):1204-14
12. Fuchs CS, et al. Dietary fiber and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma in women. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(3):169-76
13. Jacobs ET, et al. Intake of supplemental and total fiber and risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence in the wheat bran fiber trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 11(9):906-14
14. Alberts DS, et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians’ Network N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1156-62
15. Tan KY, et al. Fiber and colorectal diseases: separating fact from fiction. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(31):4161-7
GI references in this blog post values are derived from: Atkinson FS, et al. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31(12):2281-2283
Hi John, great stuff-could detect in your opening response that it was a case of “where do I start with this garbage”. The woman from Diabetes UK referred to their position statement on low-carb diets
http://www.diabetes.org.uk/About_us/Our_Views/Position_statements/Low-carbohydrate-diets-for-people-with-Type-2-diabetes/
Can you do your usual hatchet job on this please?
Keep on the work, keep following the money!
Dr Briffa..read your book 3 weeks ago and it all makes perfect sense to me! I have been able to half my insulin dosage and feel like a new person! My husband(non diabetic) also feels so much better on this way of eating.
It is a crime that Diabetes.uk is ignoring your expert advice and I believe they are digging a big hole for themselves which is going to keep growing unless they wake up! Worse than having diabetes is that actually most of us are doing the opposite of what we should be in regards to eating and this will in turn put most of us on more medication, put more of a burden on the health service and will kill us before we are ready to go!
Please keep up the good work Dr Briffa! I am certainly tellling everyone I know, diabetic or not!
john, you’ve clearly exposed a blatant sham, and the appropriate people deserve to be severely punished. it’s really obvious there is serious corruption and financial bias involved too, not just ignorance.
i suggest we figure out a way to give the CEOs of both Diabetes UK and Kellogg’s diabetes type 2, and then force them to go on their own suggested diets. that’ll be getting even real good!
on second thought, we probably don’t even have to figure out how to give them diabetes type 2 – their ridiculous diet will do it for us.
Gary/
Hi, doc… We have the same situation here in the US. The “official” diabetes diet expoused by our American Diabetes Association (ADA) consists of 60-65% carbs, while discouraging dietary fat (especially saturated fats) because the say it causes heart disease. Every month, the cover of it’s magazine shows an extravagent, sugary dessert that’s meant to appeal to diabetics with a “sweet tooth.” As with Diabetes UK, when ones probes into the ADA’s funding (it is a charity, too), you find that a big chunk of it comes from carb-centric food companies. As I reported in a recent expose on my website entitled “Official Diabetes Advice That Can Kill You:” “… a large chunk of the ADA’s funding comes from food companies who sell some of the worst products that contribute to diabetes and obesity — including Coke, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, Hershey’s, Cadbury Chocolates, and various refined-carb breakfast cereals. These companies essentially buy an endorsement from the ADA (at $500,000 a pop!), which includes the right to use its logo on their foods.” The balance of its funding comes from drug companies and pharmacy chains. In short, the companies profition from the diabetes explosion. The ADA also sends out solictitations for donations under the guise that they’re searching for a “cure” for diabetes. I find this particularly disingenuous. The “diabetes indstry” in the US is worth $US175 billion ($US400 billion globally), so there’s no way the ADA is going to kill its cash cow. There’s way too much money to be made from treating diabetes, rather than curing it. Advising diabetics to continue consuming the very foods that made them sick in the first place in unconscionable, reprehensible, and borders on the criminal. Many of us are well aware that proper diet and lifestyle will usually reverse Type 2 and reduce the insulin load for Type 1s. This education, not drugs, should be the first line of treatment for the majority of new Type 2 patients. But here in the US, insurance companies will not reimburse physcians who might otherwise prefer to treat patients this way — so there is no incentive to do so. Ours is more of a “disease care” system than “health care.” But the diabetes world is changing. We are seing what I call a “Revolt of the Type 2s” underway. Already, 15% of Type 2s here have stopped taking drugs and now rely on diet and lifestyle to manage/reverse their condition. The trend is spreading rapidly. New books citing research studies documenting that Type 2 can be reversed by diet and lifestyle, such as yours, and “The Blood Sugar Solution” (just released by Dr. Mark Hyman), and mine (co-authored with Dr. Stefan Ripich), “The 30-Day Diabetes Cure” (150,000 copies sold), among others, are giving Type 2s the means to free themselves from this utterly preventable and revesable lifestyle condition (I call it “the first corporate-sponsored disease” — if you don’t count lung cancer). Thank you for exposing the lies and deceptions being spread by UK Diabetes — and how they are intentionally profiting from innocent peoples’ unnecessary misery. Together we will eradicate Type 2 and lead people to health, hope, and freedom! Jim Healthy http://www.30daydiabetescure.com
hi there
My question is about carbs and exercise. I feel, that high intensity is really hard to do, since my muscles are probably not getting much carbs to metabolize during the session. I eat about 100-120 grams of protein and I guees some of that is being used for glucose. Do you have any advice regarding this? Thanks in advance. I must say, it has been a reel challenge to change many of my previously ideas about healthy eating. I can now see for my self, how the standard dietetic advice is just not working! thank for you interest in this field and helping to push for more sound advice!
Thanks for a great article. I have a background as clinical dietician and Master of Public Health and supported the idea about lots of carbs in the diet for a long time. I am in the postion now at 38, that I have developed some sort of diabetes, mayby type 2, mayby some sort of MODY. I am convinced that my high intake of CARBS has led to this earlier than later, giving me high postmeal bloodsugars for many years which now has resulted in betacell failure and diabetes. I can control my blodsugar by eating about 80 grams of Carbs a day. The brain function is working – I think
Sorry for any bad spelling, I am danish, but not eating any of that..;-)
best wishes Pia Houmoeller
@doctormike – in the Diabetes UK “rebuttal” I like this bit best “Other reported side effects include headaches, lack of concentration and constipation.” – as opposed to blindness, ulcers, limb loss…. jeeez!
Hi, doc… We have the same situation here in the US. It’s the “official” diabetes diet of our American Diabetes Association (ADA) consists of 60-65% carbs, while discouraging dietary fat (especially saturated fats) because the say it causes heart disease. As with Diabetes UK, when ones probes into their funding (it is a charity, too), you find that a big chunk of it comes from carb-centric food companies. As I reported in a recent expose on my website entitled “Official Diabetes Advice That Can Kill You:” “… a large chunk of the ADA’s funding comes from food companies who sell some of the worst products that contribute to diabetes and obesity — including Coke, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, Hershey’s, Cadbury Chocolates, and various refined-carb breakfast cereals. These companies essentially buy an endorsement from the ADA (at $500,000 a pop!), which includes the right to use its logo on their foods.” The balance of its funding comes from drug companies and pharmacy chains. They also send out solicitations for donations under the guise that they’re looking for a “cure” for diabetes. I find this particularly disingenuous. The “diabetes industry” in the US is worth $US175 billion ($US400 billion globally) so there’s no way the ADA is going to kill its cash cow. There’s way too much money to be made from treating diabetes than curing it. Advising diabetics to continue consuming the very foods that made them sick in the first place in unconscionable, reprehensible, and borders on the criminal. Many of us are well aware that proper diet and lifestyle will usually reverse Type 2 and reduce the insulin load for Type 1s. This education, not drugs, should be the first line of treatment for the majority of new Type 2 patients. Here in the US, insurance companies will not reimburse physicians who might otherwise prefer to treat patients this way — so there is no incentive to do so. Ours is more of a “disease care” system than “health care.” But the diabetes world is changing. We are seeing what I call a “Revolt of the Type 2s” underway. Already, 15% of Type 2s here have stopped taking drugs and now rely on diet and lifestyle to manage/reverse their condition. The trend is spreading rapidly. New books citing research studies documenting that Type 2 can be reversed such as yours, and “The Blood Sugar Solution,” just released by Dr. Mark Hyman, and mine, “The 30-Day Diabetes Cure” (150,000 copies sold), and others, are giving Type 2s the means to free themselves from this utterly preventable and revisable lifestyle condition (I call it “the first corporate-sponsored disease” — if you don’t count lung cancer). Thank you for exposing the lies and deception being spread by UK Diabetes — and how they are intentionally profiting from innocent peoples’ unnecessary misery. Together we will eradicate Type 2 and lead people to health, hope, and freedom! Jim Healthy
This is excellent John, and so enlightening to hear the interview! It is organisations like this that need a good shake-up, and as you quite rightly point out, soluble fibre can be an irritant to the gut.
This roughage Diabetes UK recommend is far too aggressive and abrasive for the gut to cope with. If we are to look at these ‘experts’ for guidance, they should be more informed about the Glycaemic Index and the dangers of carbohydrates breaking down into sugar. It is no surprise then, that diabetes is epidemic!
To Pia Houmoeller … Does your doctor have you on a statin drug? These are nortorious for causing muscle weekness. Jim H
I can’t help but laugh, i really can’t. If i raised my eyebrows any higher i wouldn’t have to worry about my receding hairline!
As a PT i do a lot of research to make sure i benefit my clients to the best of my ability.
Obviously in this research one naturally gravitates to a particular “style” if you will, but hopefully without excluding all other sources of information.
Although i don’t slavishly follow Dr.B, as i have a couple of issues regarding his stance on water consumption and exercise, I do endorse the majority of his views on diet.
Equally, i have now learned to adopt a “follow the money” mantra, as well as adopting a macro-perspective on any so called advice that is given out regarding health and fitness.
Of course the danger is that you bounce back and forth between mouthpieces like a demented ping pong ball, but i look to the proof of the pudding. For example my mentor is a 6% bodyfat guy who follows a paleo type diet, he’s certainly not a sponsored advisory board…
I’m by no means an anti-carb zealot; come on- a tiger loaf covered in philly, or hovis seeded sensations toasted covered in butter? Nom Nom Nom! I enjoy a rare pizza even.
But 80/20, eat quality, cook properly and get off my arse? Well, you should see me now compared to what i was–and i teach this approach to my clients!
I just give them better eyes to look with, and take them off autopilot, point them at websites like this and tell them to question, question, question.
My eyebrows have resumed normal service.
Keep up the good work
@ jimhealthy. Thanks for your input. Nope, no statins for me. My lipids have never been better, since I am on a low carb, but also low saturated fat diet. – I am aware of the different opinions regarding this. I eat lots of n3 and n9 to optimize my lipids, but also to make sure to keep inflammation to a minimum,since n-6 is proinflammatory. My doctors claim they have never seen a case like me.
Thats only because they simple j dont understand, how a patient can have high OGTT blodsugars and is still able to keep HgB1aC in the normal range. I actually feel pressure to “relax” and accept high postmeal bs, eventhough I have already developed a small fiber neuropathy, which was what led me to messure my bloodsugars in the first place. Cant say enough how people really have to take this in to their own hands. I am just glad I have the background as a dietetician which has made the whole process a lot easier.
Brilliant advice yet again ……….the whole world’s health is at stake you only need to look at how sick huge sections of the population have become following the LOW FAT fad diet!!!! yes it is a fad whose promotion through fear based advertising has reaped trillions of dollars for the illness industry and certain sections of the agriculture sector and even this pales into insignificance when you look at how much money is being made by big Pharma selling their drugs to a fear ridden population who are desperately trying to be well but will never be if they follow the advice of the “authorities”.
QUESTION EVERYTHING …………RESEARCH FOR YOURSELVES ……..MAKE YOUR DOCTORS WORK WITH YOU. NOT DICTATE FEAR BASED DRUG COMPANY PROPAGANDA MASQUERADING AS CARE FOR YOUR HEALTH AT YOU LIKE YOU ARE AN IMBECILE THAT CANT READ AND THINK FOR YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU DOCTOR BRIFFA ………MEDICAL PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF ARE WORTH THEIR WEIGHT IN GOLD …………even if you don’t always get it right at least your mind is open to explore issues until you find something that works!!!
This has been been such an interesting week or so for your blog, and having been a low carb eater for so long, I am thrilled that at long last you might be being heard by “people higher up the chain” who just might have some influence on the appalling diet and dietary advice so prevalent in parts of the western world; however the “follow the money” worry tends to dampen my hope! But do keep in for the long haul John.
Wonderful article, Dr. Briffa !!! Both my husband and I are type 2 diabetics – which we probably brought upon ourselves by drinking to much sugary beverages and eating too much starchy foods – a typical South American diet. Well, we are the living example that cutting out bad carbs really works. I won´t go into detail but for anyone still in doubt, do it. It works. Thank you Dr. Briffa and “Keep up the good work”
There was an extensive meta-analysis in BMJ a couple months ago that showed low intake of fiber being linked to colon cancer in prospective cohort trials. A very recent systematic review in Diabetes Care stated that there is some evidence that low carb diets may have many metabolic advantages while affecting negatively on LDL cholesterol levels. Swedish dietary guidelines for diabetes (2011) fully endorse the use of moderately low carb diet as an alternative for low fat, mediterranean or low GI diet.
Thanks Dr Briffa, for another wonderful exposition on the best way to deal with Type 2.
I was fortunate enough to be selected by Dr Mark Hyman as one of 500 people in a beta group chosen to implement his Blood Sugar Solution — out of 10,000 applicants.
Anyway, even though I only adopted a “Partial” BSS, the results were dramatic — far lower FBSs, lower weight, lower HbA1C, lower LDL, dropped one of two drugs, disappearance of two chronic physical conditions.
Please continue your valuable mission!
How can the various health organisations of, which DIABETES UK is one, continue to be registered as charities when many of them have been hijacked by the medical profession? Many of them are now infiltrated by and run by doctors, being backed by some of the giants of the Pharma Chemical Drug Industry. Visit some of their meetings, especially the A.G.Ms, to see the road show also to see what I mean
Superb as always Dr B! Thank you for all the amazing work that you are doing to raise awareness of this horrific scam. Will be covering this in The Complementary Medical Association’s monthly e-newsletter out shortly.
Hi Doc
Like you I find the advice given out by Diabetes uk (exactly the same as NHS choices website) is not the best. I have had type 1 diabetes for 40+ years and still remember the days when I ate what I wanted and stayed comfortably thin. This was before I was diagnosed and started on insulin at age 9. In the bad old days it was one injection a day and fingers crossed that it worked, no blood tests then to monitor and the strict advice to eat carbohydrate with every meal AND between meals as well. I always had biscuits in my school bag. Although very active I felt like my whole metabolism had changed and have struggled to keep my weight in check ever since. In my fifties and on a very (what I thought was a) healthy diet my weight just kept creeping up. Apple shape with BMI >26, eating all the healthy foods recommended low fat etc and brisk walking at least an hour a day (dog does not allow otherwise). After years of conditioning I was very wary of a low carb diet but started about 8 months ago reducing from >300g CHO a day (including fruit and veg) to <100g. It has certainly worked, now my BMI< 22 and weight sustained easily. What I do not understand is that after an initial lowering of my insulin dose it seems now that I am back on my old doses although I am not eating the carbs. I have to inject more insulin just to keep my blood sugar in line but this is not causing weight gain. I have not changed my protein intake (fish & pulses mainly) and have only increased fat slightly – it is a hard habit to crack after so many years. I am reading your book which only seems to refer to type 2 diabetics, but the logic of insulin levels being the direct cause of weight gain does not seem to hold with me and I am in the unusual position of knowing exactly how much insulin I have every day.
Hilary, this is very interesting. One implication could be that it isn’t insulin that causes weight gain in many people but the high-carb diet the professionals recommend to go with it. It would be interesting to know whether other T1s have noticed the same effect. I’ll have a look round the http://www.diabetes.co.uk/Forum to see
David B – Insulin facilitates the gaining of weight. It is only produced when the body needs to keep blood sugar levels in check and blood sugars rise on when you consume any kind of carbohydrate. The insulin allows the body to store fat. When I became type 1 diabetic at age 12, I suffered the usual chronic symptoms of raging thirst and massive weight loss as your body starts to use your fat stores for fuel since it cannot use the sugar in your blood without the presence of insulin. The result is that you get progressively thinner (by this stage your body has stopped producing insulin and therefore cannot gain weight).
Did anyone hear the radio 4 programme yesterday with Professor Tom Sanders, Head of Diabetes and Nutritional Services Division at Kings College London, about the dangers of eating red meat ? Well I wrote to Tom Sanders asking for his thoughts on low carb diets for type 1 diabetics and this is his reply:-
“Low carb diets are not a good idea if you have type 1 diabetes. Your main concern is to avoid hypos. We recommend the DAFNE programme for people with type 1 diabetes. If you are hypo aware then you will know the signs when you need some carbohydrate.”
So it is clear that despite the effiicacity of low carb diets, the message is still not reaching many professionals who seem anchored to the past 40 years of popular belief despite the fact that they are struggling to get results from low fat high or moderately high carb diets. I feel like we are all members of a secret club who know what is right not just for diabetics but for the general population but how to spread the message more effectively than word of mouth ? As far as I am concerned, I think children should be taught the low carb message from an early age so that the ethos can be implanted in the hope that we can start to stem the flow of obese type 2 potentials in the future. Though that would involve government and I fear that government have too many powerful businesses to appease.
DAFNE can be followed on a low carb diet – it seems – quite worryingly – that Prof Sanders has somehow missed this rather obvious point. Sure – hypos are dangerous but so too is hyperglycaemia. First we need to educate the specialists and the diabetes nurses so that they gain an understanding of how all this stuff works – and eventually it will filter down to the patients. And yes, Julian King – I think you are a member of a rather secret club. There seem to be very few diabetics (Types 1&2) with a real understanding of what they need to do to manage this condition. On a happier note – my mum who is now 72 and was diagnosed with Type1 back in the 1970s and has followed a low carb diet pretty much since then. She pioneered DAFNE (despite the dire warnings of impending death from her consultants) – she’s a very brave and intelligent woman – who worked out for herself exactly what she needed to do to stay well. She just followed the logic. She remains unbelievably well – and is free of the complications that one ‘should’ see in a Type 1 diabetic diagnosed as long ago as the 1970s.
I totally agree with this. Last year I read three books that totally changed the way I understood food and how it affects weight and health. As a by-product I am now two stones lighter than I have been for most of my adult life and feel healthier and more energetic aged 43 than I ever did in my 20′s and 30′s.
1, Why we get fat and what to do about it by Gary Taubes, 2. The New High Protein Diet Dr Charles Clark and 3. Wheat Belly by William Davis. These three publications let me see for myself the total and utter sham that poor people around the world are being duped by. Even the UK obesity forum website suggests eating 8 portions of carbohydrates to only two of protein. As the author of Whet Belly states – “telling diabetics to control their condition by eating more of the food that probably caused it in the first place is like telling someone with credit card debt that the only way to get rid of the debt is to spend more on the card” Lunacy, and as has been said already another case of big industry getting their mucky fingered lobbyists to excert power in the corridors of government. We know of BIG TOBACCO, BIG PHARMA Now meet BIG FOOD who are keeping us all so ovreweight and ill so that their friends in BIG PHARMA can keep selling billionsm of dollars of drugs that help to control conditions that the food caused in the first place. What a screwed up society.
Thank you Dr Briffa for an excellent post and a very interesting contribution on Radio 4. It was very disturbing to hear what sort of advice is being given although I never cease to be amazed by what my patients tell me – recently I have had a newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetic patient who had been told by the Diabetes Nurse at his GP surgery to start his day with a couple of digestive biscuits (perhaps one of the well known biscuit brands are also sponsoring Diabetes UK?). I am sure that your work will help enormously to get the correct message out there.
It’s unbelievable, outrageous really, that Diabetes UK is still giving out this completely wrong advice. I’m sure the damage they’re doing outweighs all the good they might do in other ways. Even the American Diabetes Association isn’t this bad. They used to say “make starches the star” of a diabetes diet. Now they encourage more protein and unsaturated fats, but still don’t say low-carb. There’s no excuse for Diabetes UK doing this. Thanks for calling them out.
David Spero RN, author of Diabetes: Sugar-coated Crisis. http://www.davidsperorn.com
Hi David Spero. I’d also noticed that the ADA has changed it’s advice over the last year; there’s hope!
David B … I’m not so sure about the “hope” re: the ADA in the US. It’s official diet is still 60% carbs — and it is still selling its endorsements to makers of breakfast cereals, sports drinks, and candy. Essentially, very little has changed. Jim H
I live in Australia and I was diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes in December. I am 36 years old. I went to a Chinese Herbalist and did acupuncture and watched what I ate. I was on insulin for 5 weeks and I would contact the Diabetes Educators and tell them my reading was 5.2 and I was going to eat a chicken salad so if I put in my insulin I would have a hypo. They advised me to still put the insulin in but make sure I ate enough carbs to cover the insulin injection. I spoke to my doctor and she couldn’t believe that they were forcing me to eat carbs.
It has been 8 weeks now that I haven’t used any insulin injections. I don’t eat any sugars or sweets and I make sure I watch my carb intake. At my hospital checkup I showed the doctor my booklet and they couldn’t believe I wasn’t taking any insulin injections. I told them I was watching what I was eating and exercising and they responded that this wouldn’t make a difference! Again my doctor was shocked with the statement. If I eat carbs and don’t excercise and burn it off then my readings are slightly high!
The believe that the Diabetes Educators need to be re-educated and move with the times. How many other people who have been diaganosed with Diabeties could prevent themselves from injections like I have. At least I know that my pancreas needs some attention and I can’t overstress it with unneccessary foods. I wonder how many other people have used alternative medicines and watched their diets in order to reverse diabetes, no matter how long it is for. I am grateful of this second chance and I hope others can have this chance too!
Nikki
It is great news that you are controlling your diabetes without insulin with the help of a low carb diet. It would seem that your diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is incorrect and it is worrying that your medical team have not corrected their mistake and told you that you have type 2. Type 1 is an autoimmune disease making you incapable of producing any insulin. You would be seriously ill by now without insulin injections and heading for ketoacidosis if you were type 1 even if you were eating no carbohydrates at all. It does not always follow that you only get type 2 diabetes when you are unfit or overweight but this is the only diabetes that can be controlled with diet alone and as you say with better advice far more type 2 diabetics could take control with diet changes. The link below shows the underlying problem with “the experts” who still seem to believe you can only get fat by eating fat
http://www.foodnavigator.com/Science-Nutrition/Research-casts-doubt-on-benefit-of-nutritional-labelling
Hi Hilary
Thanks for your comments and the link but I think you may have misread my post..I said I have managed to half my insulin intake by reducing my carb intake not stop my insulin. I am a type 1 diabetic. I have managed to reduce my background insulin from 10 units to about 6 morning and bedtime and fast acting from 6 to 2 or 3 at lunch and teatime so am so pleased with that. Indeed if I stopped completely I would be in big trouble as you say!
Hi Hilary
Oops have just realised you were replying to another Nicki, not me so just ignore my last post! Sorry about that