Skin Cancer Foundation recognises value of vitamin D but still advises us to keep out of the sun

I was interested to read yesterday a report regarding a recommendation coming out of the Skin Cancer Foundation in the USA. The Foundation has recommended that adults increase their intake of vitamin D from 400 IU (the recommended daily amount) to 1000 IU. This is good news, I think, because there’s abundant and continuing to amass evidence that vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency is common. And a deficiency here may well increase the risk of all manner of conditions including cardiovascular disease, bone disease, multiple sclerosis and many different forms of cancer. So, upping our intake of vitamin D could well help to protect against these conditions, and will almost certainly improve general health and wellbeing.

The Skin Cancer Foundation has made a useful recommendation, but some could argue that this organisation is, to some degree, responsible for the fact that vitamin deficiency/insufficiency is so common. The organisation recommends, not surprisingly, that we be wary of the sun, and that we all use sunscreen of at least sun protection factor (SPF) 15. From the Foundation’s website:

Since its inception in 1979, The Skin Cancer Foundation has always recommended using a sunscreen with an SPF 15 or higher as one important part of a complete sun protection regimen. Sunscreen alone is not enough, however. Read our full list of skin cancer prevention tips.

Seek the shade, especially between 10 A.M. and 4 P.M.

Do not burn.

Avoid tanning and UV tanning booths.

Use a sunscreen with an SPF of 15 or higher every day.

Apply 1 ounce (2 tablespoons) of sunscreen to your entire body 30 minutes before going outside. Reapply every two hours.

Cover up with clothing, including a broad-brimmed hat and UV-blocking sunglasses.

While there is some justification for this advice, it is obviously skin-focused. And what this sort of advice can neglect is the profound benefits sunlight exposure can have on general health. While the Skin Cancer Foundation is clearly alive to the fact that vitamin D is important, it recommends that we get this through diet and supplements. The likelihood is that these recommendations will still leave many individuals short on vitamin D, especially in the winter. See here for more information on this (bearing in mind that optimal levels of vitamin D are almost certainly going to be in excess of 40 ng/ml or 100 mmol/L).

While I am not against supplementation (I am currently taking 3000 IU of vitamin D again myself), I suspect that shying away from the sun and slavering ourselves in sunscreen will almost certainly jeopardise our chances of enjoying optimal levels of vitamin D. And the risk here is that what might be good for our skin, may have profound negative consequences for other aspects of our health.

Early in 2008 I reported on a study which weighed up the pros and cons of sun exposure regarding cancer risk. Essentially, this study estimated that each life saved as a result of reduced sunlight exposure (and reduced risk of melanoma), about 10 other lives would be lost as a result of an increased risk of other forms of cancer. The authors of this study suggested that ‘increased sun exposure may lead to improved cancer prognosis and, possible, give more positive than adverse effects on health.’

On top of this, we need to remember that vitamin D and/or sunlight exposure has been linked with reduced risk of many other conditions including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Overall, while I welcome the Skin Cancer Foundation’s call for increased vitamin D intakes, I also believe that the advice it gives regarding sun exposure is likely to be doing more harm than good.

5 Responses to Skin Cancer Foundation recognises value of vitamin D but still advises us to keep out of the sun

  1. Joanne of Open Mind Required 17 June 2009 at 10:03 pm #

    I quite agree with your assessment.

    Unfortunately for the sunscreen industry, if you do expose yourself to the sun and build up melanin in your skin (get a tan), then you can stay in the sun longer without any protection, because your melanin protects you.

    But if you use sunscreen, you’ll have to use it all the time because you’ll have no melanin for protection. So then you’ll be constantly polluting your tissues and bloodstream with toxic chemicals.

    See my blog post Benefits of Sunbathing and Risks of Sunscreen.

  2. Helen Mould 19 June 2009 at 2:28 pm #

    I wonder about what chemicals are in sun screen cream and if it is bad for young skin particularly. We only use sun screen intermittently and now I am left wondering if that is worse than not at all.
    I tan easily, don’t burn and don’t use sunscreen myself. I stay out of prolonged sun or cover up bright but my husband has fair skin that got badly burnt as a 1950′s child on seaside trips. He sometimes uses sunscreen at the seaside now but not every day around the house and garden. My pre school age grandchildren have sunscreen on if they are out in the sun – say park and paddling pool – for any long period, but mostly we try to find a bit of shade or have loose cotton clothing on them. I found this technique worked with my children who grew up in Toronto where it was very hot in summer. They, like me, tan nicely and naturally. We all love the positive benefits that a nice sunny day gives but shy away from deliberate exposure to strong sun rather than put chemicals on our skin. I will email a copy of this blog to my daughter because she is bringing up the next generation in a warming climate and she too is confused about the benefits of sunscreen.

  3. Mike 19 June 2009 at 3:59 pm #

    anyone worried about cancer should know the data on vitamin D and cancer prevention.. Take a look at the site vitaminD3world for some good summaries. The site also offers a good newsletter and recently launched a new micro pill formulation of vitamin D, and offers 400 micro pills at a very good price.

  4. davidf1412 19 June 2009 at 6:28 pm #

    Good article. I’ve heard that there is no link between sun exposure and melanoma, based on the fact that it’s as common in dark-skinned races and is as likely to occur in sun-exposed as non-sun-exposed parts of the body.

  5. Robin 20 June 2009 at 12:42 am #

    I agree with davidf1412 and you can find much useful info and references to studies demonstrating this lack of link in Dr Barry Groves book, “Trick and Treat”. You’d be astonished at the high frequency of melanoma on the soles of the feet.

    Dr Groves’ website http://www.second-opinions.co.uk is very interesting & useful

Leave a Reply