Dr Briffa's Blog – A Good Look at Good Health
  • Homehomepage
  • Booksby Dr Briffa
    • Printed Books
      • Escape the Diet Trap
      • Waist Disposal
      • The True You Diet
      • Natural Health for Kids
    • Audio Books
      • Overcoming Fatigue and Tiredness and Boosting Energy
      • Overcoming Joint Pain and Arthritis
      • Banishing IBS
    • E-Books
      • 6 Essentials to Physical Health and Wellbeing
      • 6 Essentials to Emotional Health and Happiness
  • Bloglatest posts
    • Blog Archives
  • Fit for Businesscorporate programmes
    • Programmes & Lectures
    • Benefits
    • Testimonials & Feedback
    • Client List
    • Contact
  • Aboutabout Dr Briffa
  • Newsletterplus free e-book
  • Contactget in touch

Junk food ads aimed at children to be partially banned, and the practical steps that can counter the negative influence TV has on kids' health

HomeHome → Children's Health → Junk food ads aimed at children to be partially banned, and the practical steps that can counter the negative influence TV has on kids’ health
Nov, Mon 20th, 2006 Posted in : Children's Health By : Dr John Briffa 0 Comments

The end of last week saw some mixed news for those who believe that the television advertising of junk foods is a malign influence on our children’s lives. UK media regulator Ofcom has announced plans for a ban on such advertising during programming designed for children.

This is clearly a step forward, though some had been lobbying for an outright ban on junk food advertising before 9.00 pm. The problem is that the proposed rules will allow children to be exposed to adverts for non-too-healthy foods, specifically in the early evening.

Some are saying that the Government has caved in to intense lobbying from the food companies and the advertising industry, and the proposed regulations do not go far enough. On the other hand, the representatives of the food and advertising industries are claiming that the planned restrictions go too far. I suppose that’s only to be expected from individuals who seem to value good hard cash over the good health of our children.

Even if Ofcom had decided on more stringent restrictions, there are other reasons why we might want to restrict how much time our kids spend in front of the gogglebox. TV viewing is a pretty passive pastime, and also an occasion for kids to fill up on unhealthy snacks and drinks. Draconian though it may sound, one obvious strategy here is to disallow the presence of a television in a child’s bedroom.

Those interested in other strategies that can counter the negative influence television watching can have on the health of their children can find some in the piece I’ve added here.

Simple strategies for protecting kids from the hazards associated with spending time in front of the TV
Many parents recognise that one time in the waking day that offers some respite from the demands of child-rearing is when their kids are sat in front of the TV. The television has considerable powers in terms of grabbing and holding a child’s attention, and can even exert an almost-magical calming influence on small children in particular. However, the trance-like state induced by TV-viewing also gives food companies the ideal opportunity to ply children with their wares. Adverts for soft drinks, confectionery, sugar-charged breakfast cereals and fast foods that come through the screen clearly do little to foster healthy eating habits in young impressionables. I was therefore very pleased to read that a UK-wide campaign has got underway to restrict the marketing of food directly to children and give them a welcome commercial break.

However, while television watching can subject children to barrage of mesmerising advertisements for none-too-healthy foods, this is not this is not the only hazard associated with this activity. TV time is often also a prime time for kids to indulge in some snacking on unwholesome stuff such as sweets, biscuits or couch potato crisps. There is even some evidence that television viewing increases the likelihood of a child eating in the absence of hunger. The overriding of internal cues for the need for food can lead children to exceed their calorific requirements for the day. While I am a fan of snacking, I do think it is something that should generally be reserved for times when there is genuine need for fuel. It also helps if some or all of the typical fare had by kids in front of the TV is replaced with healthier items such as fresh or dried fruit, nuts, and cut-up carrot, cucumber or celery.

Another unwelcome side-effect of TV viewing concerns this pastime’s ability to detract from other more health-giving activities. Generally, the more time children engage in the spectator sport that is television watching, the less time they spend engaged in actual sport. The selling off of school playing fields and an increasing emphasis on academic testing mean that there is an increasing onus on parents to ensure that their children get enough healthy exercise. While organised sport may provide an outlet in this respect, recent evidence shows that less formalised activities can bring considerable benefits. Family-oriented pursuits such as walking, cycling and swimming provide ideal opportunities for the burning up of energy, even in children who may not have a particularly sporty bent.

Bearing in mind its likely effects on children’s eating and exercise habits, it is perhaps little surprise that some doctors and scientists are seeing television watching as a quite potent force in the ballooning rates of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. In one study, risk of obesity swelled by 12 per cent for every hour a child spent in front of the TV each day. Another study found that in children aged 7 ” 11, those watching 3 ” 5 hours of television a day were 50 per cent more likely to be obese compared to children watching 2 or less hours of television each day. While TV watching is often said to induce the development of square eyes, there is good evidence that it increases the risk of children ending up with rounded bodies too.

← Why the body mass index (BMI) is virtually useless for assessing health
Yet more evidence that ‘high-carb, low-fat’ diets are ‘fatally’ flawed →
Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a Reply

Post Comment

Recent Posts

  • Power to the people May 11, 2012
  • Another reason to avoid sunscreens May 11, 2012
  • Study suggests that insulin may drive weight gain after stopping smoking May 11, 2012
  • Getting more sleep could make it easier to control our weight May 2, 2012
  • Prominent cardiologist reveals some of the the flaws in conventional cholesterol wisdom April 30, 2012
  • The dark side of sunscreens April 30, 2012

Categories

  • Brain and Behaviour (156)
  • Children's Health (87)
  • Cholesterol and Statins (77)
  • Diabetes/Metabolic Syndrome (111)
  • Exercise and Activity (88)
  • Food and Medical Politics (288)
  • Healthy Eating (544)
  • Herbal Medicine (42)
  • Low-Carbohydrate (163)
  • Men's Health (37)
  • Nutrients and Supplements (211)
  • Pregnancy and Fertility (24)
  • Sleep (43)
  • Specific conditions (197)
  • Stress (5)
  • Sunlight (99)
  • Unhealthy Eating! (271)
  • Weight Loss (243)
  • Women's Health (144)

Dr Briffa’s Newsletter

Recent Posts

  • Power to the people Power to the people May 11, 2012
  • Another reason to avoid sunscreens Another reason to avoid sunscreens May 11, 2012
  • Study suggests that insulin may drive weight gain after stopping smoking Study suggests that insulin may drive weight gain after stopping smoking May 11, 2012

Navigate

  • Home
  • About Dr Briffa
  • Blog
  • Printed Books
  • Audio Books
  • E-Books
  • Newsletter
  • Fit for Business
  • Contact

Dr John Briffa
+44 (0)20 8341 3422
john@drbriffa.com

© 2002-2012 Dr John Briffa
Website Designed by New Earth Vision

Disclaimer:

Information and advice contained in this website should not be used for the purposes of diagnosis or as a substitute for medical advice. Always consult your doctor or healthcare professional before beginning any new treatment or regime. Dr John Briffa assumes no responsibility or liability for any consequence resulting directly or indirectly for any action or inaction you take based on the information contained in this website.